DEEPTECH & BIOTECH
European deep tech drew €15 billion in 2024 — nearly a third of all European VC. The valley of death between scientific proof and commercial product is still claiming companies at the same rate.
DeepTech and biotech require a fundamentally different due diligence framework. Technology Readiness Level, IP provenance from academic spin-outs, regulatory pathway realism, and the capital requirements between TRL 4 and commercial scale are the questions that determine whether a deal is fundable — or whether the science is real but the business isn't.
Why it’s different
Traditional DD frameworks fail when confronted with bleeding-edge physics or molecular biology.
Deep tech investing requires domain expertise that most generalist VC DD processes don't provide. A quantum computing platform, an AI drug discovery engine, or a synthetic biology toolkit cannot be evaluated with the same framework as a B2B SaaS company. The fundamental questions are different: Is the science real? Can it be reproduced? Is the IP actually owned by the company? How much capital is required between where the technology is now and where it needs to be for commercial deployment?
01
Technology Readiness Level is not just a slide in the deck — it is the investment thesis
The TRL framework (1–9, from basic research to full commercial deployment) is the most important single variable in a deep tech investment. TRL 1–3 is research; TRL 4–6 is the valley of death; TRL 7–9 is commercial-ready. Most European deep tech unicorn rounds occur at TRL 6–7, where technology risk is largely retired but scaling risk remains. A company presenting at TRL 5 with a target of TRL 7 in 12 months needs to show a credible, costed path to that advancement. Most don't. We assess TRL independently and objectively — not from the founder's framing, but from the technical evidence.
02
Spin-out IP from universities is almost always more complicated than the founders say
European deep tech is disproportionately born from university research — from Leuven, ETH Zurich, Cambridge, EPFL, TU Munich. University IP assignment is rarely clean: co-inventors who have left the institution, government-funded research with public access obligations, cross-licensing requirements with the parent institution, and background IP licensed but not assigned. We review IP transfer documentation, the assignment chain from each named inventor, and the scope of background IP licensed from the university — because the acquirer in a future exit will do the same.
03
Regulatory pathway timeline is the single most commonly mis-specified variable in the investment model
For biotech, medtech, and regulated deep tech, the path from working prototype to commercial deployment runs through regulatory bodies: EMA, MDR, the EU AI Act for medical AI, EASA for aerospace, and sector-specific certification bodies. These processes have minimum timelines that cannot be shortened by engineering resources. Deep tech ventures require 35% more time and 48% more capital than traditional tech startups to generate revenues. We assess regulatory pathway realism independently of the founding team's optimism.
Assessment Areas
Where we focus in DeepTech & Biotech engagements.
AI in DeepTech & Biotech
AI is accelerating scientific discovery. It is not replacing the regulatory pathway.
AI is creating genuine breakthroughs in computational biology, drug discovery, materials science, and quantum simulation. The pace of discovery is accelerating. The pace of regulatory approval is not. For deep tech investors, this means that the value creation opportunity is real — and that the gap between scientific breakthrough and commercial revenue remains long and capital-intensive, regardless of how sophisticated the AI layer is.
Opportunities we verify
AI drug discovery that compresses early-stage research timelines. Generative AI and ML models trained on molecular structure data are genuinely compressing the hit-to-lead phase of drug discovery. For biotech investors, the question is whether the AI platform is genuinely differentiated, whether it is integrated into a proprietary biological assay pipeline, and whether the output quality is validated by downstream clinical evidence.
Computational platforms that replace expensive physical experimentation. In materials science, synthetic biology, and semiconductor research, AI simulation platforms that can screen candidate materials in silico before physical testing compress experimental cycles. Companies with proprietary experimental data to validate their simulations create a feedback loop that improves model accuracy with every physical experiment run.
Scientific AI that generates publishable, peer-reviewed results. A deep tech company whose AI platform has generated results validated through peer-reviewed publication has cleared a reproducibility bar that most competitors have not. This is a meaningful moat signal in a sector where scientific credibility directly affects partnership, licensing, and acquisition conversations.
Risks we surface
TRL 4 presented as TRL 6. The valley of death runs from TRL 4 to TRL 7, and it is structurally underfunded in the European ecosystem — the EIC Transition programme had its core challenge tracks suspended in 2024. Companies that need to cross this valley will require capital that current investors may not be equipped to provide at the required check size.
IP transfer that looks clean but isn't. University IP assignment agreements are often written by technology transfer offices whose primary obligation is to the institution, not to the spin-out. Background IP licensed on a field-of-use basis, co-inventors who didn't sign the assignment, and government-funded research with publication obligations all create IP fragility that surfaces in exit due diligence.
Regulatory optimism that isn't grounded in pathway analysis. Deep tech companies with novel mechanisms — AI diagnostic systems, gene-editing therapies, novel biomaterials — face regulatory pathways that have no historical precedent. The EU AI Act's high-risk classification for medical AI, combined with MDR/IVDR obligations, creates a compliance intersection that regulatory bodies are still actively working to harmonise.
Know what you’re backing before you commit.
X-Ray delivers a full product and tech verdict on any deep tech or biotech target in one business day — assessing technology readiness independently, reviewing IP transfer documentation, and evaluating regulatory pathway realism.
250+ European engagements · 100% partner repeat rate